'College Degree Necessary Essay\r'

'In Barbara Ehrenreich’s name, â€Å"The Higher upbringing Scam” she expresses her feelings slightly employers steping specifically for college grads to fill their positions. Ehrenreich seems to be voicing her feelings to employers because they be beginning to look specifically for college grads, instead of people who may tolerate more experience and knowledge, or even currently work for the organic law. She claims that employers seek college grads merely because they hand a college ground level and it shows they hold up the ability to listen and obey.\r\n turbid within Ehrenreich seems to be onseting the college grads by dictum that once they build finished take aim and acquire their degree, they be now slaves to the employers. Her claim is quite transparent and the fonts she gives validate what she is saying. Conversely, she seems to be expiration on a theory with her argument and her attacks on the college grads for going to school and earning a degree detracts from the value she has built up. Finally, Ehrenreich’s argument is effective to some degree, but wish of personal experience leave the condition with a flaw.\r\nEhrenreich uses value and emotion within her article to pick up the attention of her auditory modality. We all fill jobs in effectuate to deliver through life and if you want to have a good job, you select to get a degree. This puts a lot of value in what you pick up to accomplish because the final product is suppose to be price it, and employers volition only hire you if you are a college grad. Ehrenreich uses this example to connect with her audience and adds to the credibility of her argument.\r\nThroughout the article Ehrenreich adds humor to help come an emotional connection with her audience. She says that what perpetually you learn in college doesn’t seem to theme. All that employers are look at is that you were up to(p) to sit still for capacious periods of time, be told what to do, and appear awake. Ehrenreich is saying that no matter what degree you’ve in force(p) take in, all employers are look at is that you devoted 4 years doing what your told. She adds, â€Å"no college has merely been honest enough to offer a degree in seat-warming” (696).\r\nThis is most correspondingly what you will end up doing when you begin working at a white-collar job anyways, so by hiring you they know you are able to do what they ask. She in like manner goes on to imply that you will be do-or-die(a) for work because of the debt you have just accrued and you win’t become a troublemaker, or tattle blower. You’ll basically grovel at their every need and do exactly what your told. Ehrenreich adds to the credibility of her article by giving examples of people who have been able to do something and do it well, but didn’t have a degree to back it up.\r\nThey were either send awayed from their job, or called out on it once they b ecame popular. She gives the example about Marilee Jones who worked for MIT as the doyen of admissions for twenty-eight years. Marilee claimed she had three degrees and yet she genuinely didn’t have any. Now if Marilee had through with(p) a poor job as the dean of admission it would be easy to forgive and accept her from her position, yet she was very successful and it was threatening to an foundation garment of higher learning.\r\nThis gives us an emotional appeal because it’s a personal story of sadness for Marilee and it causes the audience to wonder if a college degree is really value it. She did a good job for the institution and just because she didn’t have a degree, they were willing to dismiss her. Is that really all the companies want is a degree; or do they want someone who is going to do a great job for their organization? Throughout Ehrenreich’s article she flummoxs attractive true to her argument, employers seek out college grads.\r\nA lthough she puts in the example of â€Å"Dr. Dennis Waitley Ph. D” who is known for writing a best(p) selling self-help book The Secret. He confessed to non having a master’s degree and the marketing profligate he worked for admitted that they couldn’t confirm he ever received his Ph. D. This example adds to Ehrenreich’s credibility, but it seems to go off what she talks about in the mass of her article, which seems to be more along the lines of employers. It does however stay true to her title, â€Å"The Higher Education Scam”.\r\nFor her article to be spot on with her argument, she should have stuck more with education and touched on different subjects like employers, writers, and other people in general who have not had college degrees, but were still successful in their fields. In Ehrenreich’s article she doesn’t attack anyone in particular with what she is saying, but she keeps her comments vague so it is up to the reader to interpret the hidden meaning. In the beginning she talks about the amount of lies world put into resumes in order for people to get certain positions they are applying for.\r\nShe says, â€Å"that 10-30 percent of resumes include distortions if not outright lies” (696). She adds to this with some more humor in saying, â€Å"lying is a grievous sin, as everyone distant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue knows” (696). This comment adds humor to the article as well as a weensy ad hominem because of the hidden attack. Ultimately, the article by Barbara Ehrenriech is effective. She shows credibility with the examples she uses and the only flaw seen is that she doesn’t have a personal example herself. She keeps humor going in the article, which keeps the audience drawn in and is very discursive in her viewpoints.\r\nEhrenreich really makes you think after tuition her article. Should we go to college in order to get a degree and work for a good partnership? Should emplo yers really just look for candidates that have earned that college degree hoping they will obey their every need? Should employers give there currently employees a contingency to earn a college degree instead of being dismissed from their position? Is it worth over sounding other candidates for positions strictly because they don’t have a degree when they will be able to do the same job and possibly do it better?\r\nTo sum it all up, why do employers really need to be looking for a college degree? Is the time and money really worth it to earn that degree for a position that you are going to learn on the spot anyways? Employers really need to think about what they are doing and not just jump on the bandwagon and make sharp generalizations. Works Cited Ehrenreich, Barbara. â€Å"The Higher Education Scam. ” Inventing Arguments, 2nd ed. Eds. prank Mauk and John Metz. Boston: Wadsworth, 2009. Print. 69-697.\r\n'