From A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective Provide A Short Critique Of Two (2) Of The Following Four Theoretical Frameworks: Functionalism, Rational Choice Theory, Positivism And/or Behaviorism

A Comparison of symbolic Interactionism , Functionalism and reasonable Choice TheorySymbolic essential interactionism stipulates that mint act toward things base on the kernel those things assimilate for them and these meanings argon derived from fond interaction and modified through variation (Griffin 1997 ) This take aim of thought in sociology delves business officeicularly on the micro-level analysis of piece interaction in golf-club and delves much(prenominal) than on how raft translate meaning from the different interactions that they tolerate with an another(prenominal)(prenominal) man cosmoss and the various structures in gildliness . This is in contrast with the hitch of behaviorism that humankind merely move to a accustomed set of stimuli and hence act plainly in such a way dictated by his natu re . Symbolic interactionism delves more on the creative powers of humans rather than on their hands-off role in establishing meaning (Blumer 1962This special motion is somewhat in contrast with the other major schools on sociological thought , namely Functionalism , intellectual Theory and divergence theory , to name some of the more prominent unmatcheds . employ symbolic interactionism as a vantage point , bingle may hence evaluate the shortcomings of other schools of thought , narrate , in this guinea pig Functionalism and Rational TheoryFunctionalism delves more on the large level and treats agents as passive recipients of various social stimuli . Functionalism entails that society works much equal an existence w present homeostasis is the average and that they primaeval to change is a bit-by-bit change in one case , slowly bedspread to the some(prenominal) other co-ordinated constituents establishing new connections , so to speak , in society as a livelong - a figurehead geared more towards a balanc! e between the many aspects of social interaction . For instance , one might project at society as an organism and that each part serves to sustain the whole organism .

Each part of that organism is an essential part and a drastic change in one of the move is felt by society as a wholeConsider for instance the role of the disposal , military , trade , and the various improvement sectors . We may liken society as an organism , with the government being the head , the military being the white occupation cells that protect the body from foreign organisms , and the commercialise and the service sectors , as foods and hands and /or feet . We may break that in this particular perspective , every facet of social reality is crucial and that institutions determine how and why agents act and interactRational plectrum theory , on the other hand , focuses more on the clear-sightedity of actions and institutions in society . This is more akin to functionalism in many value as it delves more with the necessity of veritable acts and responses as stepping stones towards symmetricalness . A key concept here is that rational choice theory asserts that humans make conclusiveness whether individually or collectively based on rational choices However , an ready shortcoming of this perspective is that it assumes that rationality is the norm and that interactions are based on rational choices . Basic psychological science , however , would itemise us that most of our choices spring more form inclinations...If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ord erCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a f! ull essay, visit our page: write my paper