Censorship of Pornography :: Social Issues Argumentative Censor Porn Essays

security review of PornographySex, Erotica, nude women, three some, these are some keywords for finding vulgarism on the internet. The censorship of soot has a prescribed affect on the linked States of the States and is a good thing because smut fungus leads to crime, pornography has no positive effects on society, and censor pornography is not against the constitution. Crimes and pornography do a direct and apparent link. Eighty-one pct of criminals rate pornography as their highest inner interest ( ). This means that the muster out majority of criminals love pornography and find it highly interesting, most some other people probably rank other human beings as their highest sexual interest. When an adult book store is closed the crime rate in the surrounding areas f boths significantly ( 188). Also It was found that child molesters have a higher probability of molesting a larger number of victims and it is liable(predicate) that these offenders have some access to pornog raphy or erotica. ( 189). Over all crime and pornography do have a link in the midst of them and that makes censoring it a positive idea for America. Pornography has no positive effect on society. The American population agrees that pornography does not swear out a legitimate purpose. Seventy-two percent of Americans expect some disunite of crack down on pornography. Also Ninety-two percent of Americans want a crack down on child pornography because it has no value and is disgusting and against the law ( 179). Pornography was found to have unforesightful redeeming social value by artistic criteria and is close to expenditure less ( 218). The censoring of pornography is not against the United States Constitution. The reason why pornography is not included under the constitution is because it was demeaned by the United States Supreme court in 1973 to be lewd and obscene somatic ( 173). The first amendment was intended to protect political speech in America not the speech that i ncludes the exploiting of women and photography of women being raped ( 183). The founding fathers did not intend for their bill of rights to be exploited in the ways that it is nowadays they would have wanted us to have a safe and collected society. That would be one that does not include pornography. The opposition to the censoring of pornography will say that it is against the United States Constitution, which it is not. They will also say that it is censoring thoughts and ideas not actions.